Now that Hillary Clinton has “suspended” her campaign for the Democratic nomination for president, millions of angry, white women are turning their disappointment-led ire toward Barack Obama and assuming that it is his responsibility to heal the party:
Obama is the victor, now let’s see what he does. The burden is on him as it should be.
Now let’s see if Obama can deliver. He has much to do and undo. Yes, his unfortunate comments “Hillary, you are likeable enough” spoke volumes. He was some work to do.
First, let’s get one thing straight: Barack Obama did nothing to Hillary Clinton or her supporters that he should or could undo.
- One Democratic candidate said that the Republican presidential candidate was obviously qualified to be president and suggested that the other Democratic candidate was not.
- One Democratic candidate repeatedly claimed that the other Democratic candidate might not be able to beat the Republican.
- One Democratic candidate derided the other Democratic candidate’s capabilities (and, by extension, that candidate’s supporters) as nothing more than empty rhetoric.
- One Democratic candidate’s campaign was dismissive of the other Democratic candidate’s numerous state primary/caucus wins.
- One Democratic candidate’s campaign implied that racial bias was behind their successes and failures.
- One Democratic candidate tried to change the party’s rules mid-race to boost their campaign.
- The other Democratic candidate said that candidate one was, “likable enough”.
In fact, Obama only brought up his opponent in response to the most unfair and divisive rhetoric (see above), rhetoric that is dangerous to the party and the country come November.
This TPM reader and Hillary supporter at least gets it half right:
She did so much “just right” and could have won it had she not had the rough treatment from the media.
This person at least understands who was unfair to Hillary. But it is a wild stretch of the imagination to say that she “could have won it” if not for the misogyny and Clinton-animus displayed by a number of prominent media gasbags. In fact, backlash against this unfair treatment may have been a driving force behind Clinton supporters and is widely credited for her late, come-from-behind victory in the New Hampshire primary. Her campaign might have been over many months ago had she not won that contest.
Finally, this Clinton supporter lobs one additional insult at Obama supporters:
If there are those Democrats who still feel it is necessary to denigrate Senator Clinton and her run for the Presidency, I would ask them to think about the change they advocate and the no more politics as usual. The only way to say no to the Washington politics of the past 20 years is to stop hating and start moving forward.
Every man that has lived with a woman knows about resentment built on perceived slights. And it isn’t surprising that this Clinton supporter should project her resentment on Obama supporters. But the truth of the matter is that most Obama supporters seem heartsick (perhaps I’m projecting somewhat here), not hateful, about what the Clinton campaign did to the Clintons and yearn for the party to unite against our common enemies.
And, incredibly, this last Clinton supporter seems to think that saying “no to the Washington politics of the past 20 years” requires Democrats to “stop hating” when it should be obvious, particularly to a Clinton supporter, that the politics of the past 20 years has been all about Republican hatred of liberals and Democrats and the abject failure of the corporate media. It will take everything liberal Democrats can do to overcome this deep ignorance and mass media turpitude and teach even many Democrats who our real enemies are.